Skip to main content

Why Premium Content Doesn't Use "Coverage" Anymore

Your knowledge still carries over, with a better mechanism and flexibility.

What's new

Coverage worked in two layers, and each layer did a different job. Coverage tags defined what to track — your terms and your competitors. Coverage groups bundled those tags together and gathered everything that matched, so every article that hit one of those terms accumulated in the group over time.

In the new Premium Content, we split those two jobs apart and gave you better tools for each:

  • Collections now handle organizing content — and they do more than a coverage group ever could.

  • Keywords now handle defining what to track. They replace coverage tags, and they work the same way across search, collections, and reporting.

If you're mapping the old vocabulary to the new: coverage tag → keyword coverage group → collection

For Example: Here is a collection on "ARInsights"

Keyword: "ARInsights"; or can add multiple like "ARchitect"

Same outcomes you rely on today. More flexibility to get there.

What happens to your existing coverage and reports

You won't need to rebuild anything from scratch:

  • Every coverage group you have today will be migrated into a collection. The coverage tags inside it become the keywords that power that collection's search.

  • Articles you'd built or reported on using those coverage tags will be migrated into a report, built from the new collection in its place.

Once that's done, your reports get an upgrade for free: mentions now come with AI Sentiment (positive, negative, neutral, mixed, or unavailable, each with a confidence level and a supporting quote) in place of the old 1–5 perception score, and you can search with full Boolean logic — must, should, must-not, exact or fuzzy — instead of a single keyword box.

Did this answer your question?